• Alert Sign Up
TunnelTECH

Disaggregation of soil during slurry pipe jacking 18 Aug 2016

Neil Philips, City University, London
Research sponsored by the Pipe Jacking Association results in design of a slurry mixing test to predict the disaggregation behaviour of soil ahead of specification of the separation plant. The article below is based on the abstract of the PhD research of Neil Philips, who was supported throughout the project by funding from the Pipe Jacking Association.

Pipe jacking is an increasingly important underground utility construction method for urban environments where disruption to other ground-level infrastructure is expensive. The need to tunnel through varying geologies requiring support during tunnelling has led to the increased use of slurry TBMs.

New research published by the Geotechnical Engineering Research Group of City University, London, assesses the magnitude of soil disaggregation during the excavation and pumping of the arisings within the slurry to the separation plant. The two main objectives were to create a mixing test that would allow the disaggregation of the soil to be predicted prior to specification of the separation plant, and to link the results of this test to typical soil properties. In addressing the second objective efforts have also been made to characterise the different mechanisms of disaggregation observed in the mixing tests. The typical soil testing methods used to classify the soil samples were; Atterberg limits, particle size distributions, unconfined compressive strength, mineralogy (XRD) and chemical analysis (XRF). Soil samples taken were from various Crossrail excavations.

Schematic of a typical slurry separation system
Schematic of a typical slurry separation system

A mixing test has been designed using a Hobart planetary mixer to classify the amount of soil cuttings that disaggregate during mixing with a slurry fluid. This test was found to produce repeatable results using Speswhite Kaolin samples and then used to assess the differences in disaggregation rates of London Clay, Upper Mottled Beds and Fleetwood Silts. In total, 71 mixing tests were completed during the development of the test and the classifying of the soils. The test involved mixing distilled water with 10 clay cuttings for varying periods of time. The resulting solid particles were then sized through a series of sieves and sedimentation tests carried out to produce a particle size distribution of the resulting soil.

The mixing tests showed the Upper Mottled Beds to have the highest rate of disaggregation, with the Fleetwood Silts displaying the least. This has been attributed to the level of cementing within the soil and the microstructure of the clay and silt-sized particles.

The liquidity index and initial soil strength were not found to be important factors in predicting the rate of disaggregation of a particular soil type, but were significant for some soils. The Fleetwood Silts had the lowest unconfined compressive strengths but also produced the least amount of disaggregated soil. The soil macrofabric, although not quantified, also appeared to have an effect on the rate of disaggregation of a particular soil. An increase in discontinuities within the sample produced more cuttings larger than 4.75mm but a lower amount of 63μm sized fraction disaggregated.

In addition to the mixing tests carried out using water, a series of tests were completed using a polymer-based slurry, HydroCut CF. This showed mixed results; the polymer prevented any clay or silt-sized particles from passing through the 63μm sieve. However, there was no overall reduction in disaggregation and a significant increase in the time it took to sieve the slurry.

           

Add your comment

Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and comments. You share in the wider tunnelling community, so please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language professional.
In case of an error submitting Feedback, copy and send the text to Feedback@TunnelTalk.com
Name :

Date :

Email :

Phone No :

   Security Image Refresh
Enter the security code :
No spaces, case-sensitive